<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  include() [<a href='function.include'>function.include</a>]: Unable to access /var/www/html/rogue-development/blog2/wp-content/advanced-cache.php in <b>/var/www/html/rogue-development/blog2/wp-settings.php</b> on line <b>62</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  include(/var/www/html/rogue-development/blog2/wp-content/advanced-cache.php) [<a href='function.include'>function.include</a>]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in <b>/var/www/html/rogue-development/blog2/wp-settings.php</b> on line <b>62</b><br />
<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  include() [<a href='function.include'>function.include</a>]: Failed opening '/var/www/html/rogue-development/blog2/wp-content/advanced-cache.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/share/pear:/usr/share/php') in <b>/var/www/html/rogue-development/blog2/wp-settings.php</b> on line <b>62</b><br />
<br />
<b>Notice</b>:  add_option was called with an argument that is <strong>deprecated</strong> since version 2.3 with no alternative available. in <b>/var/www/html/rogue-development/blog2/wp-includes/functions.php</b> on line <b>3468</b><br />
<br />
<b>Notice</b>:  register_sidebar_widget is <strong>deprecated</strong> since version 2.8! Use wp_register_sidebar_widget() instead. in <b>/var/www/html/rogue-development/blog2/wp-includes/functions.php</b> on line <b>3382</b><br />
<br />
<b>Notice</b>:  register_widget_control is <strong>deprecated</strong> since version 2.8! Use wp_register_widget_control() instead. in <b>/var/www/html/rogue-development/blog2/wp-includes/functions.php</b> on line <b>3382</b><br />
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I like my proposed catalyst workflow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/why-i-like-my-proposed-catalyst-workflow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/why-i-like-my-proposed-catalyst-workflow/</link>
	<description>Comments and thoughts on technology from Marc Hughes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 18:36:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gilles Guillemin</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/why-i-like-my-proposed-catalyst-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-1057</link>
		<dc:creator>Gilles Guillemin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=488#comment-1057</guid>
		<description>It took me some times but now I&#039;ve got my challenger workflow ready:
http://www.flexstuff.co.uk/applications/catalystbuildersync/

Ok, ok, I can hardly see mine being able to compete with your approach when it&#039;s about working with large teams, but still :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It took me some times but now I&#8217;ve got my challenger workflow ready:<br />
<a href="http://www.flexstuff.co.uk/applications/catalystbuildersync/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flexstuff.co.uk/applications/catalystbuildersync/</a></p>
<p>Ok, ok, I can hardly see mine being able to compete with your approach when it&#8217;s about working with large teams, but still <img src='http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PIA Blog / Productivity by Design &#187; Collaboration entre Flash Builder &#38; Catalyst</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/why-i-like-my-proposed-catalyst-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-1056</link>
		<dc:creator>PIA Blog / Productivity by Design &#187; Collaboration entre Flash Builder &#38; Catalyst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=488#comment-1056</guid>
		<description>[...] Marc&#8217;s Musings &#171;&#160;Why I like my proposed Catalyst workflow&#160;&#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marc&#8217;s Musings &laquo;&nbsp;Why I like my proposed Catalyst workflow&nbsp;&raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/why-i-like-my-proposed-catalyst-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-962</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=488#comment-962</guid>
		<description>@Peter That&#039;s  pretty much what I was thinking.  There will be probably be some interesting conversations between design and development to make sure to structure those interactions in a way that the code can correctly invoke them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter That&#8217;s  pretty much what I was thinking.  There will be probably be some interesting conversations between design and development to make sure to structure those interactions in a way that the code can correctly invoke them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Molgaard</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/why-i-like-my-proposed-catalyst-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Molgaard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=488#comment-961</guid>
		<description>Great stuff... I strongly agree that it should be targeted to keep the output of FC &quot;readonly&quot; from the perspective of the developer working in FB.
Your proposed workflow somewhat resembles the workflow we have with the Flex Toolkit for Creative Suite when exporting Flex skins, so its not that farfetched... all we have to understand is that the &quot;skin&quot; now includes the entire IxD as well... or am I jumping to conclusions here ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff&#8230; I strongly agree that it should be targeted to keep the output of FC &#8220;readonly&#8221; from the perspective of the developer working in FB.<br />
Your proposed workflow somewhat resembles the workflow we have with the Flex Toolkit for Creative Suite when exporting Flex skins, so its not that farfetched&#8230; all we have to understand is that the &#8220;skin&#8221; now includes the entire IxD as well&#8230; or am I jumping to conclusions here ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yet another Flash Catalyst / Builder workflow method &#124; Flex Stuff by Gilles Guillemin</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/why-i-like-my-proposed-catalyst-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-932</link>
		<dc:creator>Yet another Flash Catalyst / Builder workflow method &#124; Flex Stuff by Gilles Guillemin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=488#comment-932</guid>
		<description>[...] (25/06/09): Marc Hugues published today an excellent update on why he thinks his approach is a good one, and one must admit that his arguments are solid (go and have a look, if only for the lovely [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (25/06/09): Marc Hugues published today an excellent update on why he thinks his approach is a good one, and one must admit that his arguments are solid (go and have a look, if only for the lovely [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samBrown</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/why-i-like-my-proposed-catalyst-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>samBrown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=488#comment-920</guid>
		<description>great article, always interested in more efficient work flow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article, always interested in more efficient work flow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/why-i-like-my-proposed-catalyst-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-918</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=488#comment-918</guid>
		<description>Once your working in Flash Builder, you can use FLV just like you normally would.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once your working in Flash Builder, you can use FLV just like you normally would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/why-i-like-my-proposed-catalyst-workflow/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=488#comment-917</guid>
		<description>How about FLV implementation in FC? whether through embedding or preferable SOURCE LINKAGE</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about FLV implementation in FC? whether through embedding or preferable SOURCE LINKAGE</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

