<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Flash Catalyst / Builder workflow method</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/a-flash-catalyst-builder-workflow-method/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/a-flash-catalyst-builder-workflow-method/</link>
	<description>Comments and thoughts on technology from Marc Hughes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 03:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/a-flash-catalyst-builder-workflow-method/comment-page-1/#comment-1059</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=430#comment-1059</guid>
		<description>Kirk,

Wowzers, I didn&#039;t realize that.  I&#039;ll need to investigate a solution.  I imagine a script could be made to give them all explicit names, but that syncronization could be tricky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kirk,</p>
<p>Wowzers, I didn&#8217;t realize that.  I&#8217;ll need to investigate a solution.  I imagine a script could be made to give them all explicit names, but that syncronization could be tricky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kirk Holbrook</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/a-flash-catalyst-builder-workflow-method/comment-page-1/#comment-1058</link>
		<dc:creator>Kirk Holbrook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=430#comment-1058</guid>
		<description>This is great. Your other posts about Catalyst/Builder workflow are exceptional, as well.

One note however. If you place multiple Catalyst components in Builder (for instance, two copies of your LoginForm, or your InheritenceExample) then the references to the textinput2 and button1 objects will not work in the second instance. This is due to the fact that the components have no IDs, and these names are generated on-the-fly as they are added to the Display List.

This could be overcome by using the component&#039;s child list and mapping the components to the order of the children. But even the child list order could change as the designer makes changes in Catalyst and re-exports the design.

It sure would be nice if Catalyst allowed the designer to give the sub-components IDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great. Your other posts about Catalyst/Builder workflow are exceptional, as well.</p>
<p>One note however. If you place multiple Catalyst components in Builder (for instance, two copies of your LoginForm, or your InheritenceExample) then the references to the textinput2 and button1 objects will not work in the second instance. This is due to the fact that the components have no IDs, and these names are generated on-the-fly as they are added to the Display List.</p>
<p>This could be overcome by using the component&#8217;s child list and mapping the components to the order of the children. But even the child list order could change as the designer makes changes in Catalyst and re-exports the design.</p>
<p>It sure would be nice if Catalyst allowed the designer to give the sub-components IDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cody Munger</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/a-flash-catalyst-builder-workflow-method/comment-page-1/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>Cody Munger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 18:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=430#comment-964</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this.  You just saved me a lot of potential headache with the artists ... I hope.  I just with the generated names from catalyst were a bit more descriptive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this.  You just saved me a lot of potential headache with the artists &#8230; I hope.  I just with the generated names from catalyst were a bit more descriptive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Watson</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/a-flash-catalyst-builder-workflow-method/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Watson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=430#comment-867</guid>
		<description>My company has been working on a workflow between the two tools as well and we are finding a bunch of limitations, some of which you covered.

I think the biggest limitation with this is when the generated code from catalyst renames the components.

e.g. button1 or textinput2 no longer refers to the button or text field that you had intended after you get a recompiled FXP from the designer


Catalyst itself has a lot of limitations as well, especially when trying to adapt to a system that is already in place rather than building the system from the ground up. (e.g. you already have services or front-end dto/vo objects and the data list that is generated gives generated data property names that don&#039;t apply and can&#039;t be changed)

Anyway, thanks for your post, it was informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company has been working on a workflow between the two tools as well and we are finding a bunch of limitations, some of which you covered.</p>
<p>I think the biggest limitation with this is when the generated code from catalyst renames the components.</p>
<p>e.g. button1 or textinput2 no longer refers to the button or text field that you had intended after you get a recompiled FXP from the designer</p>
<p>Catalyst itself has a lot of limitations as well, especially when trying to adapt to a system that is already in place rather than building the system from the ground up. (e.g. you already have services or front-end dto/vo objects and the data list that is generated gives generated data property names that don&#8217;t apply and can&#8217;t be changed)</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for your post, it was informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seth</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/a-flash-catalyst-builder-workflow-method/comment-page-1/#comment-851</link>
		<dc:creator>seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=430#comment-851</guid>
		<description>super interesting. i&#039;m looking for a good workflow and this makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>super interesting. i&#8217;m looking for a good workflow and this makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fardeen</title>
		<link>http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/2009/06/a-flash-catalyst-builder-workflow-method/comment-page-1/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Fardeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rogue-development.com/blog2/?p=430#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your feedback on Catalyst !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your feedback on Catalyst !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
